Initial Project Feasibility Findings:
A "Go" for MDRS Moon Mission #1
November 20, 2004 - updated Nov. 24, 2004
To Moon Society Leaders, Advisors, and Team Members:
Re: Report on Initial Project Feasibility Findings.
by Peter Kokh
A Unique Opportunity
The Mars Society's facility in Utah has been rented for one two-week crew rotation slot each year since
its opening in 2001 by Bill Clancey's team from NASA for the purpose of field testing exploration robots.
Now the Mars Society has announced an opportunity for other space organizations to rent this facility
for two week 6-crewmember exercises at a quoted price of $7,000.
This is an unprecedented opportunity for the Moon Society as it will allow us to conduct exorcises
from which we may glean useful information, without the high front end costs of building and outfitting
our own analog station. Indeed, the lessons we stand to learn from this "rent before you buy" opportunity
promise to result in a much improved and more ergonomic design for our own analog research station, Project
LETO, at some time in the future.
The $7,000 cost for one crew rotation, while something we could pay for out of current funds, is a
figure that it should not be to difficult to raise from a donor sponsor, supportive of our goals, and
happy to have the exposure opportunity for a name, product line, or company. The figure comes down to
a little over $1,000 for each crew member for a unique 2-week field-vacation. However, we do not propose
that prospective crew members pay for more than their round trip transportation to the customary staging
point in Salt Lake City.
Philosophy of Approach
What this is not. This project is not about simulating the series of missions it will take to build
a fully functional private enterprise Moonbase. It is about simulating exercises and activities that future
crews will need or want to do on the Moon, in a suggestive environment, under those conditions that can
be simulated, in order to learn what works and what does not - in the field.
Simulation exercises already performed in the Canadian High Arctic on Devon Island and in Utah by Mars
Society crews have already changed established (read NASA and/or contractor) thinking about how to go
about various things. For example, an early lesson was that pressurized rovers should be preceded en route
by scouts in open, unpressurized ATV analog vehicles that will find negotiable paths for the big pressurized
rover. Further, tethered and teleoperable mini-rovers should be aboard these scout ATVs so that when needed,
they can explore a crevice or scarp to determine its negotiability. The little agents are also useful
to examine the undercarriages of larger vehicles for potential damage from rocks and boulders.
The idea is not to provide 100% faithful simulation. That would be prohibitively expensive and has
proven unnecessary to uncovering information useful in redesigning activities and equipment for more satisfactory
performance.
It has proven to be most useful to put the experimenters, the crew people in the field, "in the mood,"
by having them observe "Sims." They put on mockup spacesuits, go through pre-breathing exercises, and
exit the hab's airlock whenever they go outside. That the suits are not even close to the real thing does
not prove to be important. There is a classic old Science Fiction tale by Clifford D. Simak, by the title
of "The Big Back Yard" that suggests what is happening here. In this tale, there sits a country home on
a quiet road, surrounded by countryside, Earth countryside. You enter the front door, walk through the
house, and exit the back door. But lo and behold, when you open the back door, you are not looking on
that same terrestrial countryside that you saw, obviously surrounding the home, when you entered it. You
are suddenly about to step out onto another world, from which perspective, the whole house, front door
included, sits on an alien landscape.
When crew members first come to the Mars Desert Research Station and enter the hab door in their street
clothes, they are entering a facility obviously on Earth. But when they exit that door in their Sims Spacesuits,
they are entering a Martian terrain. The mind set contributes productively to the conduct of their experiments
and exercises in a way conducive to producing lessons that either affirm exercise or equipment design
and function or suggest improvements and sometimes complete new approaches.
The crews have also experimented with living conditions, but this line of exercises has been given
less stress and is spotty: one crew experimented with a macrobiotic diet; another crew's experiments with
minimizing water usage, startled NASA experts who on paper had assumed that personnel would need three
times as much water per person as now proves to be the case.
Doing Moon Outpost Simulations at this Facility
First, there can be no doubt that this is not an ideal location for us. The geology is sedimentary
and there will is no sedimentary rocks or deposits anywhere on the Moon where open water has never flowed.
There is no basaltic terrain here either.
That means that what geology experiments we can do here will be reduced to testing equipment that measures
gravity, heat flow and other things, and indeed such experiments can be done anywhere. So while the Mars
crews have hosted many a geologist student or professional with a research program that needed field testing,
this does not appear to be a promising line of activity for us. Clearly, if and when the time comes for
the Moon Society to launch its own analog station, we need to find a more appropriate setting, one where
there are lava flows or basaltic lava floods, lavatubes, etc. That suggests NE California, Eastern Oregon
and Washington, and Eastern Idaho.
Nor are biology experiments designed to search for extremophile bacteria or other signs of life that
conceivably may be found on Mars. Instead, we propose looking for researchers who have experimental agriculture,
horticulture, and biospheric experiments they want to field test at MDRS under our watch.
However, this does not exhaust the possibilities for performing useful EVAs. The Utah site does have
some areas, if the many pictures available online are a clue, that in color and terrain appearance, are
suggestively moon-like. For example a large expanse of bentonite:
http://cobalt.cbqc.net/mdrs/fs01/images/crew04/c04d11eva04.jpg
I have applied for an early crew assignment on one of the scheduled Mars crews this season so that
I can do reality checks on many of the ideas proposed below. On that personal schedule is mapping the
more lunar-like areas of the surrounding terrain for EVA routes by our crews.
WHAT MOON SOCIETY CREWS CAN DO AT MDRS.
In pouring over the archives of past crews at the Mars Arctic and Mars Desert stations, I have compiled
a respectable list of ideas for crew experiments and simulations. Then I went over the list to sort these
ideas into three main categories I shall label IVA, CVA, and EVA.
IVA - inside vehicle/hab activities
CVA - activities immediately outside (circum) the hab
EVA - excursions outside the vehicle/hab
CVA is admittedly a new category. We'll explain the need below.
Next I sorted the ideas in each category according to expense of required equipment and difficulty,
in order to come up with a list of options for a first two-week rental exercise that are relatively easy,
inexpensive to set up, yet valid and promising respectable results.
While the idea is to simulate exercises on the Moon, some of the items identified will apply to exercises
on Mars as well as the Moon. In pursuing them, we will be "giving something back" to our Mars Society
hosts, by way of lessons they can apply to their own future exercises.
#top
MDRS MOON MISSION #1 EXERCISE IDEAS
IVA - Activities inside the MDRS Hab
As mentioned, only sporadic, non-dedicated attention has been given by Arctic Mars and Desert Mars
Crews to simulating the experiences and activities of future explorers and pioneers inside the Habitat
areas. Not only does this lack of attention leave us with many opportunities to go further, it is our
belief that by more closely simulating the living conditions of future pioneers, we will do a better job
of putting our crew personnel "in the mood" for their outside the hab exercises.
Areas for Mood-setting IVA Simulation Exercises
Foodstuffs, food preparation, and menus - we have a former Milwaukee (LRS) chapter member who
took the lead in preparing the menu for a Space Frontier Vegetarian Luncheon at ISDC '98 in Milwaukee.
The luncheon guest speaker was Alan Binder of Lunar Prospector. The event was well attended, and many
people were surprised by how much they enjoyed the luncheon. At MDRS, we propose to restrict ourselves
to dry, freeze-dried, and otherwise dehydrated foodstuffs for the most part, reconstituting with water,
as if it were "produced on location from local oxygen and hydrogen," as would be the case on the Moon.
As our Moonbase is likely to have a garden area producing fresh salad stuffs, but probably not enough
for daily use, we propose to have our Hanksville contact bring in fresh salad stuffs twice during the
exercise, for the first Sunday meal, and for the last Friday meal on the eve of departure. The crew would
suggest improvements and alterations to try on any follow on crew mission.
Mood-setting Ambience - Little has been done at MDRS to provide a Mars-feel ambience to the
interior of the Hab. During my scouting trip to Hanksville, I will be examining the interior for mood-setting
decor options and accessories that are easy to put up and take down when we leave. I have a host of ideas
here, most of which I may try to provide personally, at token expense.
Tableware at MDRS is comprised of simple white correlle, a user-friendly (breakage resistant)
choice, but hardly anything that says "Mars." I have made it an action item to look at some options for
tableware, mugs, etc.
Arts & Crafts - On the real frontier, one thing pioneers with an artistic bent can do to
make everyone feel more at home, is to create useful and/or decorative accessories out of local materials.
Hopefully, on the first and each of any follow on crews we will have at least one person who can pursue
this kind of activity. Art and craft stuffs will be of two types: "trashure" - items made out of discarded
trash, and glass, ceramics, sand paintings, or other ways of turning local soil and rock into something
decorative.
Recreation - The Hab has a respectable library of books, tapes, and games, and every crew person
is invited to bring an item to leave behind.
Music - We could play with Lunar "Filk" songs, contributing to a Lunar frontier song book, as
Mars crews at MDRS have been doing. Musical instruments made from Moonbase trash might include a steel
pan drum, and/or a marimba, which might also be made of ceramics using local materials (or brought along,
made from let's-pretend or looks-like lunar materials.
Games - One of the all time classic best games of the world is Mancala or Oware. A simple game
involving a carved or scultped board with twelve bowls or pits, and seed or pebble game pieces supports
endless strategies for winning. We intend to supply one made of ceramic or simulated ceramic over metal
or wood.We'll rename it "Craters & Rocks"
Ergonomic Experiments - How user-friendly is everything in the Habitat? We might experiment
with moving things around (those things that are not fastened down, at least) to see if there are more
ergonomic arrangements. We can also examine prescribed routines for their "ergonomic sense."
Media interviews should be scheduled, including at least one with a back home station or newspaper
from each crew members hometown. Some of the early MDRS crews have done this.Exercise - Muscle
tone and fitness may be a problem area for lunar crews operating in one sixth Earth-normal gravity. Isometrics
is the most promising idea, and if isometric equipment is not a feature of MDRS, we could contribute some.
Another option is to provide foot-powered electrical power generation for personal electronics within
one's cabin, provided we have a volunteer crew member. We'd want to log any difference in total use time
of electronic devices dependent on foot power, as opposed to when they are just plugged in or operating
on batteries.
Consumables Minimization Experiment - I have another experiment, one that would result in recommendations
that could result in a drastic lowering of toilet paper consumption, that I would like to run by crew
members, to be run on a voluntary basis, so long as results are logged.
"Define & Design" Exercises - At end of our first (and any follow-on) mission, the crew
will discuss ideas suggested by their experiences inside the Hab, of how our own Lunar Analog Habitat
should be laid out and organized, what features it should have, and what activities it should support,
as well as suggest things to be tried on follow on MDRS Moon Missions.
A first crew could also determine the Hab interface specifications for the design of a retrofit removable
periscopic window design, and for a sun-pipe system if this has not been done on the prior scout mission.
These items, once designed and assembled, could be put in place for testing whenever they are ready. The
assumption here is that if we are living in a shielded habitat with direct access to views of the outside
surroundings and to sunlight would be cut off by the shielding envelope. The project would be to test
non-electronic engineerable workarounds.
LOGS & REPORTS - Filing reports and logs is a daily inside activity of all MDRS crew members.
With a view of promoting improvements, both for future MDRS crews in general, and for any future MDRS
Moon Missions in particular, I propose we log several additional activity areas:
Sims-on/Sims-off Log - documenting every time we must, or choose to, "break Sims" i.e.
go outside without a "spacesuit", document the time out, time back, and reported reason or excuse. We
want to create a record that we can examine for opportunities to improve Sims Fidelity. This includes
having supplies and replacement parts brought in from Hanksville, the local town a few miles away - something
absolutely out of order for Mars missions, and which ideally should require a minimum 3-day delay for
Moon missions. Obviously, the law of diminishing returns applies. There is a point where, for our purposes,
an additional area of Sims Fidelity is just not worth the bother and expense.
Food-Menu Log - recipes tried and reactions and lessons; suggestions for improvements.
Trash discarded Log - efforts at sortation to promote recycling where feasible, including separation
of items requested by the "trashure craftsperson."
Crew Operations Manual discrepancy Log - logging every time we do, or find it necessary or convenient
to do, something in a manner other than prescribed in the current Crew Manual. The idea here is to suggest
realistic and melioristic improvements to the Crew Manual..
NOTE on above proposals - While we might not be able to perform all of the above simulation
ideas on our first MDRS Moon Mission, they are all simple enough, inexpensive enough, and yet valid enough
to be considered. We propose to do as many of the above as feasible.
CVA - Activities in the Immediate Vicinity ("circum") Outside the MDRS Mars Hab
Background - While MDRS Operations has not identified the habitat periphery as a special activity
area, it already is such, including the GreenHab Greenhouse, the Musk Observatory, and an auxiliary solar
photovoltaic power system.
The Greenhouse - We will want to study the Greenhouse operation with a view to determining how
feasible it would be for us to contribute to its improved operation in follow on MDRS Moon Missions. For
example, in reply to my suggestion, Gus Fredericks believes that we could easily experiment with raising
Talapia in the last tank in which treated water is held prior to exiting the system. Talapia are an edible
fish that do well in recycling water systems, and have become a staple addition to many "back to nature"
"Mother Earth" type Greenhouse operations. On future missions, the crew members might enjoy a Talapia
filet along with their fresh salad stuffs for their final meal on the eve of departure. Gus also thinks
my idea of mushroom cultivation has merit. But these are things we will want to try in the future, if
and when we are doing a pair of back to back MDRS Moon Missions, as that will provide needed continuity.
Our crew(s) should study the Greenhouse operation, as well as alternative options, to make experience-weighted
suggestions for what kind of biospheric recycling systems we should install in our own future Lunar Analog
Station.
The auxiliary solar power system - our first crew would examine this system and the purposes
for which this added power is used, and work to identify additional hab-peripheral activities that would
be enabled by an expansion of this grid that future MDRS Moon Missions might choose to contribute, especially
to enable hab-peripheral experiments and demonstrations.
Site Management - this is an area of concern and opportunity that does not seem to have been
identified by MDRS Operations staff. Within this topic comes: definition and design of areas set aside
for various storage needs
Definition and design of areas to be left as undisturbed and natural as possible,
including optional "nature walks"
Provision of "shielded" but "unpressurized" areas for storage of items regularly accessed
for use within the habitat areas, and for exterior habitat maintenance activities.
In Moon Miners' Manifesto, issue # 37, July 1990, I wrote an article by the title of "Ramadas." Ramada
is a word of Spanish origin, and in driving through the plains and southwest you see it applied to roadside
canopies that provide shelter, not so much from the rain, as from the Sun. (Now you know the "rest of
the story" behind the hotel brand "Ramada Inn.") In this article, I explored the idea that if we put those
supplies and equipment that we routinely need to access under an unpressurized but regolith-shielded canopy
or hanger (or "ramada") we would have areas of "lee" vacuum, vacuum shielded from the cosmic elements
of intense sunlight, cosmic rays, solar flares, ultraviolet, and the incessant micrometeorite rain. Personnel
working habitually in such an environment could wear a more comfortable, less restrictive, lighter weight
"soft" pressure suit instead of the customary "hardened" space suit. Such areas would have similarly protected
access direct to pressurized habitat areas.
In short, we propose that one of the useful things we can do on a first MDRS Moon Mission is to design
and map out a lightweight mockup protected canopy or shed area in which routinely used supplies and equipment
are stored, and see to what extent overall EVA activities are improved by this separation of activities
into those that can and cannot easily be performed in "lightsuits" at less "exposure." Our CVA exercises
would suggest what should and should not be stored in such areas. (Obviously supplies needed stored outside
for inside use on the one hand, and supplies and stored equipment needed for EVA excursions on the other
hand.) Our findings will have an effect on overall Moonbase (and Marsbase) design.
For simulation purposes, we need only a light, easily erected and removed, framework system that would
"enclose" the "protected areas" for simulated access and maintenance activities in "lightsuits" worn in
"EVA Lite" simulation exercises. Plus an airlock vestibule with three ports: docking, full EVA to "unprotected"
outside areas, EVA Lite to "shielded" but unpressurized areas.
The cost of the needed framework components and equipment (many design options to be investigated)
should be minimal (no more than a few hundred dollars at most), should we wish to pursue this opportunity
on a follow-on MDRS Moon Mission.
Moon Mission #1 would define and map the areas around the hab to be set aside for such an add-on skeletal
structure, and identify constraints and things to model and simulate. The crew would also suggest materials
and design features for a "Light Suit" - one lighter and more comfortable than the current EVA simulation
spacesuit. We'll need such light suits if we are going to examine whatever improvements to overall operations
there are by the provision of these specially "shielded" areas.
Site Assessment for Teleoperated Shielding Emplacement Exercises - Our friends in the Mars Society
do not seem concerned with the need to provide supplemental (to the thin Mars atmosphere) shielding for
their habitats. We can step into this neglected area. As a first step, our MDRS Moon Mission #1 crew can
examine the surroundings of the MDRS site as to its suitability for tests of various automated and teleoperated
methods of site preparation (including grading and excavation) and shielding emplacement both directly
over a habitat mockup or over a host "hanger" aka "ramada." Shielding can either be in the form of a regolith
sand-pebble mix, or as sand bags or blocks.
It has been suggested that there are a number of hab-sized, even hab-shaped rocky mounds in the area
that might do. But as this is a leased site owned by the Federal Bureau of Land Management, it would be
best not to undertake any exercises that would alter the landscape. Instead, a "dummy" structure such
as an old schoolbus could stand in for the Moonbase habitat structure. A first mission would only do a
site assessment. A follow on project would be to organize a student engineering school competition, with
the finals to occur at MDRS, with much publicity both for us and our hosts.
Sims-break Log - Our first mission would also log all Sim Breaks in which activities in the
periphery of the hab were the occasion for a decision to break Sims, to perform some activity without
a spacesuit. The log will help us make operational improvements.
Energy Use Log - Our first mission would also log all power use, inside and outside of the Hab,
noting the activities supported. This log will help in design of a future 2-crew back-to-back pair of
missions to simulate the Moon's alternating 2-week long dayspan and nightspan periods and how we can efficiently
sequence tasks to be performed in two ideally energy-intensive/manpower-light and energy-light/manpower
intensive periods. The reasoning here is that even if the Moonbase has a nuclear power source, there will
still be more power available during dayspan, thanks to solar power generation, than during nightspan
when the only auxiliary (to nuclear) power will come from power storage systems fed by dayspan solar energy.
EVA SIMULATIONS - Excursions beyond the periphery of the MDRS Mars Hab
Background - In our introduction above, we already discussed the variety of pursuits that have
been followed by MDRS EVA crews, and how many of them would not be applicable for our purposes. We did
also mention that some areas of the surrounding "Mars scape" are suggestively more Moon-like in coloration
and texture and that we propose to attempt to map these areas in our scouting visit.
Non-suitability of the terrain appearance and geochemical makeup aside, EVA excursions will be a mainstay
of actual Moonbase operations, and there are useful simulations we can do in which terrain-appearance
and geochemical makeup are irrelevant. Some of these ideas require little extra, not-already available
equipment or tools. Some are more ambitious, good ideas for follow-on MDRS Moon Missions.
EVAs under special outside conditions
A daytime EVA in pre-identified grayer areas of the surroundings, under totally
overcast skies, would at least get away from the distraction of reddish, Mars-suggestive soil areas, and
the blue sky of Earth.
A nighttime Full Moon excursion would again minimize the distraction of ground color,
and provide an inspiring vision in the sky.
"Earthlight EVA" - More ambitious would be a nighttime EVA under overcast skies with
a lit large Earth Globe perched over some terrain-commanding ridge. This would be ambitious, requiring
on site batteries or a generator and a lightweight but wind-sturdy of fabric over a globe framework. For
an average EVA traverse distance of 100 yards from the globe, the globe would need to be 10 feet (a 1:30
ratio) in diameter. For greater distances, the simulated globe must be greater yet, in a proportion which
scales up materials needed with the square of the distance. Thus only a modest demo makes any sense.
Glaring surface - Black Skies - Also ambitious, but we think doable, is a nighttime EVA
that would simulate the daytime lunar EVA experience of a glaringly bright surface under an ink-black
sky. An admittedly limited simulation of this could be provided by attaching a light weight (conduit pipe)
pyramid tower attached to the 4 (or 3) corners of the ATV, with a cluster of halogen lights atop. For
example, two 200 watt halogen lamps could be directed to flood the immediate circle around the ATV and
its riders. Four 500 watt halogen lamps would be aimed at shallower angles to illuminate the surrounding
vicinity. To counterweight this assembly, the ATV would be weighted down with batteries, and/or power
invertor, and/or generator. A tower 20 or more feet high should be light enough so as not to destabilize
the ATV. For the crew, the halogen light cluster representing the Sun would be directly overhead, well
outside their horizon-scanning angle of vision. So you would have the bright "moonscape" with intense
"sunlight" and a "black sky" in which any stars would be blocked out by the glare just as they are on
the Moon.
Total Lunar Eclipse EVA - A similar arrangement with much dimmer orange color bulbs,
would simulate a lunar EVA under total lunar eclipse conditions.
We are not pretending that anything of real usefulness would come from any of these EVA simulations,
only that they could be done, and would help support the mood-setting illusion of being on the Moon. They
might be good PR.
Fork -in-the-road "Hostels" - A daytime, normal EVA of real usefulness might be
to identify EVA route "forks in the road" at some distance from the MDRS Mars Hab that would make promising
locations for parking a mobile (ATV-towable) hab where EVA crews on ATVs could overnight, in order to
support longer distance excursions through the surrounding Utah "marscapes." To accompany such spot-locating
exercise, we could work to define and design exactly what should be in such an overnight hostel, turning
over our findings to the Mars Society. The exercise would be valid for our needs on the Moon as well.
Human-Robot Teamwork EVAs - Another line of useful EVA simulation activity would be to pursue,
in a humbler fashion, the already ongoing experiments with human-robot teamwork in exploration. We could
identify tasks to be performed by companion robots, and a list of simple teleoperation commands, and have
one crew person stand in as the robot and follow the commands of the other "human" crew person. Only prescribed
commands could be used or followed. We'd learn quickly enough how that command list needs to be expanded.
We'd also learn what supported robot activities were most useful and helpful. Think of it as a left hand/right
hand partnership. For example, the "robot" stand in would identify requested types of samples, pick them
up, and present them in the requested orientation to th "human" so that the later could inspect them.
We could attempt to learn what types of inspection and analysis are better done by robots and which by
humans. This is just a first "one-head" stab at this idea. A look at this area of simulation by several
heads might either find more options or conclude that none of the above is worth our time.
Identifying Spacesuit Alteration Needs - While out on EVAs, whatever their purpose or activities
involved, we need to be alert to the limitations imposed by our suits, so that we can suggest future modifications.
The fat glove is a problem. Would a stylus extension of the right glove index finger, and a claw/fingernail/scratcher
extension of the left glove middle finger prove helpful? The Mars crews have already added many devices
to the suit arms and glove backs, such as a mirror. There seems to be much we could experiment with on
this line. It is not inconceivable that some of these suggested improvements may translate to modifications
for real spacesuits to be used on the real space frontier. At the very least, should the Moon Society
every undertake to build its own analog station, we would end up with improves EVA "spacesuits."
CONCLUSION
Many Valid Options - There seem to be many lines of indoor, close-in peripheral, and EVA excursion
exercises that MDRS Moon Missions could pursue with the reasonable expectation that we would be learning
something useful, hopefully for real future crews on the Moon, but certainly, for nearer term application
to the Society's own future Lunar Analog Research Station, as part of the long-planned Project LETO.
Activities identified above include many that will be relatively easy, and inexpensive to support,
yet valid and promising returned insights. There also seem to be quite a few moderately more ambitious
simulation exercise, but which do not appear to be overly expensive to support.
MDRS Moon Mission #1 is "a Go"
In short, our conclusion is that pending identification of an expense-assuming sponsor, it's "a Go"
for MDRS Moon Mission One.
Feedback requested. We would appreciate your constructive criticisms and contributions to this
list of ideas and "more fully bake" this proposal..
Meanwhile, in the expectation that location of a sponsor will not be a problem, I have asked the Mars
Society to reserve a crew rotation slot for us towards the end of the current season which ends in mid-May
2005.
The first Crew of Six - There will be six crew slots. I'd like to captain the first mission,
but not any follow on missions. The new India chapter proposes to send one crew member at their expense.
That leaves four spots for what I feel may be quite a number of worthy applicants. The call for volunteers
will go out shortly.
Mission Support - Remote Mission Support, primarily via email, has been provided by the Rocky
Mountain (Denver Area) Mars Society chapter. On the assumption, and it is desirable, that we provide our
own Mission Support, I have run the suggestion by our most vigorous chapter, Moon Society St. Louis, and
also by the, temporarily we hope, napping student chapter at Brigham Young University in nearby (to MDRS)
Provo, Utah. Nothing is set as yet.
Crew Perks - the crew, once picked, will have some pre-mission homework , to include naming
our mission, and designing a logo/mission patch. I would like them to go home with some momentos: copies
of the logs and photos on a CD, logo apparel items, and perhaps a two-year extension of their individual
Moon Society memberships, plus a nice framable certificate. An auxiliary goal of these exercises is to
provide abundant and varied publicity opportunities, and treating our returning crew members as "heroes
of the day" may work well for that purpose.
Publicity Opportunities - If we pursue this project their will be ample opportunities for local,
national, and international publicity in television and on the radio, on the Internet, and in the press.
A documentary and a book are not unreasonable outcomes. If we plan it right, we will be able to leverage
our collaboration not only with the Mars Society, but possibly with other groups such as SEDS and individual
college and university organizations. All this is in addition to valuable experience and lessons learned
to invest in our own Lunar Analog Research Station now still over our horizon. We hope to have many opportunities
to increase our membership, as well as our talent pool, through this project.
Peter Kokh
November 22, 2004
kokhmmm@aol.com
index top
INFORMATIVE LINKS
The Mars Desert Research Station
PHOTOS
Photo of the Mars
Hab in its surrounding landscape
The view out of one of
the Mars Hab portholes
Photo of an especially
Moon-like area nearby
A look inside a crewmember
cabin
Daily Field Reports
2003-04 Field Season 3
2002-03 Field Season 2
2001-02 Field Season 1
MDRS Operations Manual
MDRS Habitat Floor Plan
MDRS Surrounding Area Topgraphical
Map
MDRS Mission Rules
MDRS Crewmember Packing List - what
to bring
MDRS GreenHab & Graywater Treatment
System
MDRS Musk Observatory
Geological History of the area around
the Mars Desert Station
index top